In https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/27541 I added tests to assert
that the write after close bug was fixed. However the Node
implementation has an abort behavior preventing reproduction of the
original issue and the Browser build does not use AsyncLocalStorage
which also prevents reproduction. This change moves the Browser test to
a Edge runtime where AsyncLocalStorage is polyfilled. In this
implementation the test does correctly fail when the patch is removed.
Float methods can hang on to a reference to a Request after the request
is closed due to AsyncLocalStorage. If a Float method is called at this
point we do not want to attempt to flush anything. This change updates
the closing logic to also call `stopFlowing` which will ensure that any
checks against the destination properly reflect that we cannot do any
writes. In addition it updates the enqueueFlush logic to existence check
the destination inside the work function since it can change across the
work scheduling gap if it is async.
fixes: https://github.com/facebook/react/issues/27540
### Based on #27509
Revealing a prerendered tree (hidden -> visible) is considered the same
as mounting a brand new tree. So, when an initialValue argument is
passed to useDeferredValue, and it's prerendered inside a hidden tree,
we should first prerender the initial value.
After the initial value has been prerendered, we switch to prerendering
the final one. This is the same sequence that we use when mounting new
visible tree. Depending on how much prerendering work has been finished
by the time the tree is revealed, we may or may not be able to skip all
the way to the final value.
This means we get the benefits of both prerendering and preview states:
if we have enough resources to prerender the whole thing, we do that. If
we don't, we have a preview state to show for immediate feedback.
### Based on https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/27505
If a parent render spawns a deferred task with useDeferredValue, but the
parent render suspends, we should not wait for the parent render to
complete before attempting to render the final value.
The reason is that the initialValue argument to useDeferredValue is
meant to represent an immediate preview of the final UI. If we can't
render it "immediately", we might as well skip it and go straight to the
"real" value.
This is an improvement over how a userspace implementation of
useDeferredValue would work, because a userspace implementation would
have to wait for the parent task to commit (useEffect) before spawning
the deferred task, creating a waterfall.
This code is executed once React DevTools panels are mounted, basically
when user opens browser's DevTools. Based on this fact, session in this
case is defined by browser's DevTools session, while they are open. A
session can involve debugging multiple React pages. `crypto.randomUUID`
is used to generate random user id.
Corresponding logger config changes -
[D50267871](https://www.internalfb.com/diff/D50267871).
<!--
Thanks for submitting a pull request!
We appreciate you spending the time to work on these changes. Please
provide enough information so that others can review your pull request.
The three fields below are mandatory.
Before submitting a pull request, please make sure the following is
done:
1. Fork [the repository](https://github.com/facebook/react) and create
your branch from `main`.
2. Run `yarn` in the repository root.
3. If you've fixed a bug or added code that should be tested, add tests!
4. Ensure the test suite passes (`yarn test`). Tip: `yarn test --watch
TestName` is helpful in development.
5. Run `yarn test --prod` to test in the production environment. It
supports the same options as `yarn test`.
6. If you need a debugger, run `yarn test --debug --watch TestName`,
open `chrome://inspect`, and press "Inspect".
7. Format your code with
[prettier](https://github.com/prettier/prettier) (`yarn prettier`).
8. Make sure your code lints (`yarn lint`). Tip: `yarn linc` to only
check changed files.
9. Run the [Flow](https://flowtype.org/) type checks (`yarn flow`).
10. If you haven't already, complete the CLA.
Learn more about contributing:
https://reactjs.org/docs/how-to-contribute.html
-->
## Summary
Changes `before before` to `before` in error messages.
<!--
Explain the **motivation** for making this change. What existing problem
does the pull request solve?
-->
I want to improve error logs
## How did you test this change?
<!--
Demonstrate the code is solid. Example: The exact commands you ran and
their output, screenshots / videos if the pull request changes the user
interface.
How exactly did you verify that your PR solves the issue you wanted to
solve?
If you leave this empty, your PR will very likely be closed.
-->
A small refactor to how the lane entanglement mechanism works. We can
now distinguish between the lane that "spawned" a render task (i.e. a
new update) versus the lanes that it's entangled with. Both the update
lane and the entangled lanes will be included while rendering, but by
keeping them separate, we don't lose the original priority.
In practical terms, this means we can now entangle a low priority update
with a higher priority lane while rendering at the lower priority.
To do this, lanes that are entangled at the root are now tracked using
the same variable that we use to track the "base lanes" when revealing a
previously hidden tree — conceptually, they are the same thing. I also
renamed this variable (from subtreeLanes to entangledRenderLanes) to
better reflect how it's used.
My primary motivation is related to useDeferredValue, which I'll address
in a later PR.
This is the same problem as we had with keyPath before where if the
element itself suspends, we have to restore the replay node to what it
was before, however, if something below the element suspends we
shouldn't pop it because that will pop it back up the stack.
Instead of passing replay as an argument to every renderElement
function, I use a hack to compare if the node is still the same as the
one we tried to render, then that means we haven't stepped down into the
child yet. Maybe this is not quite correct because in theory you could
have a recursive node that just renders itself over and over until some
context bails out.
This solves an issue where if you suspended in an element it would retry
trying to replay from that element but using the postponed state from
the root.
<!--
Thanks for submitting a pull request!
We appreciate you spending the time to work on these changes. Please
provide enough information so that others can review your pull request.
The three fields below are mandatory.
Before submitting a pull request, please make sure the following is
done:
1. Fork [the repository](https://github.com/facebook/react) and create
your branch from `main`.
2. Run `yarn` in the repository root.
3. If you've fixed a bug or added code that should be tested, add tests!
4. Ensure the test suite passes (`yarn test`). Tip: `yarn test --watch
TestName` is helpful in development.
5. Run `yarn test --prod` to test in the production environment. It
supports the same options as `yarn test`.
6. If you need a debugger, run `yarn test --debug --watch TestName`,
open `chrome://inspect`, and press "Inspect".
7. Format your code with
[prettier](https://github.com/prettier/prettier) (`yarn prettier`).
8. Make sure your code lints (`yarn lint`). Tip: `yarn linc` to only
check changed files.
9. Run the [Flow](https://flowtype.org/) type checks (`yarn flow`).
10. If you haven't already, complete the CLA.
Learn more about contributing:
https://reactjs.org/docs/how-to-contribute.html
-->
## Summary
<!--
Explain the **motivation** for making this change. What existing problem
does the pull request solve?
-->
aligned the typing for `ReactNativeViewConfigRegistry` in
`react-native-host-hooks.js`
continuation of https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/27508
## How did you test this change?
<!--
Demonstrate the code is solid. Example: The exact commands you ran and
their output, screenshots / videos if the pull request changes the user
interface.
How exactly did you verify that your PR solves the issue you wanted to
solve?
If you leave this empty, your PR will very likely be closed.
-->
The `enableCustomElementPropertySupport` flag changes React's handling
of custom elements in a way that is more useful that just treating every
prop as an attribute. However when server rendering we have no choice
but to serialize props as attributes. When this flag is on and React
supports more prop types on the client like functions and objects the
server implementation needs to be a bit more naunced in how it renders
these components. With this flag on `false`, function, and object props
are omitted entirely and `true` is normalized to `""`. There was a bug
however in the implementation which caused children more complex than a
single string to be omitted because it matched the object type filter.
This change reorganizes the code a bit to put these filters in the
default prop handline case, leaving children, style, and innerHTML to be
handled via normal logic.
fixes: https://github.com/facebook/react/issues/27286
## Summary
When transpiling `react-native` with `swc` this file caused some trouble
as it mixes ESM and CJS import/export syntax. This PR addresses this by
converting CJS exports to ESM exports. As
`ReactNativeViewConfigRegistry` is synced from `react` to `react-native`
repository, it's required to make the change here. I've also aligned the
mock of `ReactNativeViewConfigRegistry` to reflect current
implementation.
Related PR in `react-native`:
https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/40787
We only allow plain objects that can be faithfully serialized and
deserialized through JSON to pass through the serialization boundary.
It's a bit too expensive to do all the possible checks in production so
we do most checks in DEV, so it's still possible to pass an object in
production by mistake. This is currently exaggerated by frameworks
because the logs on the server aren't visible enough. Even so, it's
possible to do a mistake without testing it in DEV or just testing a
conditional branch. That might have security implications if that object
wasn't supposed to be passed.
We can't rely on only checking if the prototype is `Object.prototype`
because that wouldn't work with cross-realm objects which is
unfortunate. However, if it isn't, we can check wether it has exactly
one prototype on the chain which would catch the common error of passing
a class instance.
Adds a second argument to useDeferredValue called initialValue:
```js
const value = useDeferredValue(finalValue, initialValue);
```
During the initial render of a component, useDeferredValue will return
initialValue. Once that render finishes, it will spawn an additional
render to switch to finalValue.
This same sequence should occur whenever the hook is hidden and revealed
again, i.e. by a Suspense or Activity, though this part is not yet
implemented.
When initialValue is not provided, useDeferredValue has no effect during
initial render, but during an update, it will remain on the previous
value, then spawn an additional render to switch to the new value. (This
is the same behavior that exists today.)
During SSR, initialValue is always used, if provided.
This feature is currently behind an experimental flag. We plan to ship
it in a non-breaking release.
There are not so many changes, most of them are changing imports,
because I've moved types for UI in a single file.
In https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/27357 I've added support for
pausing polling events: when user inspects an element, we start polling
React DevTools backend for updates in props / state. If user switches
tabs, extension's service worker can be killed by browser and this
polling will start spamming errors.
What I've missed is that we also have a separate call for this API, but
which is executed only once when user selects an element. We don't
handle promise rejection here and this can lead to some errors when user
selects an element and switches tabs right after it.
The only change here is that this API now has
`shouldListenToPauseEvents` param, which is `true` for polling, so we
will pause polling once user switches tabs. It is `false` by default, so
we won't pause initial call by accident.
af8beeebf6/packages/react-devtools-shared/src/backendAPI.js (L96)
## Summary
Currently when cloning nodes in Fabric, we reset a node's children on
each clone, and then repeatedly call appendChild to restore the previous
list of children (even if it was quasi-identical to before). This causes
unnecessary invalidation of the layout state in Fabric's ShadowNode data
(which in turn may require additional yoga clones) and extra JSI calls.
This PR adds a feature flag to pass in the children as part of the clone
call, so Fabric always has a complete view of the node that's being
mutated.
This feature flag requires matching changes in the react-native repo:
https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/39817
## How did you test this change?
Unit test added demonstrates the new behaviour
```
yarn test -r www-modern ReactFabric-test
yarn test ReactFabric-test.internal
```
Tested a manual sync into React Native and verified core surfaces render
correctly.
in #27461 the experimental prefix was added back for `useFormState` and
`useFormStatus` in react-dom. However these functions are also exported
from the server rendering stub too and when using the stub with
experimental prefixes their absence causes unexpected errors.
This change adds back the experimental prefix for these two hooks to
match the experimental build of react-dom.
The way we collect component stacks right now are pretty fragile.
We expect that we'll call captureBoundaryErrorDetailsDev whenever an
error happens. That resets lastBoundaryErrorComponentStackDev to null
but if we don't, it just lingers and we don't set it to anything new
then which leaks the previous component stack into the next time we have
an error. So we need to reset it in a bunch of places.
This is still broken with erroredReplay because it has the inverse
problem that abortRemainingReplayNodes can call
captureBoundaryErrorDetailsDev more than one time. So the second
boundary won't get a stack.
We probably should try to figure out an alternative way to carry along
the stack. Perhaps WeakMap keyed by the error object.
This also fixes an issue where we weren't invoking the onShellReady
event if we error a replay. That event is a bit weird for resuming
because we're probably really supposed to just invoke it immediately if
we have already flushed the shell in the prerender which is always atm.
Right now, it gets invoked later than necessary because you could have a
resumed hole ready before a sibling in the shell is ready and that's
blocked.
The jsx-runtime uses the ReactCurrentDispatcher from shared internals.
Recently this was moved to ReactServerSharedInternals which broke
jsx-runtime. This change moves it back to ReactSharedInternals until we
can come up with a new forking mechanism.
This adds back the `experimental_`-prefixed Server Actions APIs to the
experimental builds only, so that apps that use those don't immediately
break when upgrading. The APIs will log a warning to encourage people to
move to the unprefixed version, or to switch to the canary release
channel.
We can remove these in a few weeks after we've given people a chance to
upgrade.
This does not affect the canary builds at all, since they never had the
prefixed versions to begin with.
Upgrades the stability of Server Actions from experimental to canary.
- Turns on enableAsyncActions and enableFormActions
- Removes "experimental_" prefix from useOptimistic, useFormStatus, and
useFormState
### Based on #27453
If optimistic state is updated, and there's no startTransition on the
stack, there are two likely scenarios.
One possibility is that the optimistic update is triggered by a regular
event handler (e.g. `onSubmit`) instead of an action. This is a mistake
and we will warn.
The other possibility is the optimistic update is inside an async
action, but after an `await`. In this case, we can make it "just work"
by associating the optimistic update with the pending async action.
Technically it's possible that the optimistic update is unrelated to the
pending action, but we don't have a way of knowing this for sure because
browsers currently do not provide a way to track async scope. (The
AsyncContext proposal, if it lands, will solve this in the future.)
However, this is no different than the problem of unrelated transitions
being grouped together — it's not wrong per se, but it's not ideal.
Once AsyncContext starts landing in browsers, we will provide better
warnings in development for these cases.
## Summary
These modules are no longer referenced in the React codebase. We should
remove them to limit the API surface area between React and React
Native.
## How did you test this change?
`yarn flow native && yarn flow fabric`
I found a bug where if an optimistic update causes a component to
rerender, and there are no other state updates during that render, React
bails out without applying the update.
Whenever a hook detects a change, we must mark the component as dirty to
prevent a bailout. We check for changes by comparing the new state to
`hook.memoizedState`. However, when implementing optimistic state
rebasing, I incorrectly reset `hook.memoizedState` to the incoming base
state, even though I only needed to reset `hook.baseState`. This was
just a mistake on my part.
This wasn't caught by the existing tests because usually when the
optimistic state changes, there's also some other state that marks the
component as dirty in the same render.
I fixed the bug and added a regression test.
Fixes whatever part of https://github.com/facebook/react/issues/26876
and https://github.com/vercel/next.js/issues/49499 that
https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/27394 didn't fix, probably.
From manual tests I believe this behavior brings us back to parity with
latest stable release (18.2.0). It's awkward that we keep the user's
state even for controlled inputs, so the DOM is out of sync with React
state.
Previously the .defaultChecked assignment done in updateInput() was
changing the actual checkedness because the dirty flag wasn't getting
set, meaning that hydrating could change which radio button is checked,
even in the absence of user interaction! Now we go back to always
detaching again.
Fixes#26876 for real?
In 18.2.0 (last stable), we set .checked unconditionally:
https://github.com/facebook/react/blob/v18.2.0/packages/react-dom/src/client/ReactDOMInput.js#L129-L135
This is important because if we are updating two radios' checkedness
from (false, true) to (true, false), we need to make sure that
input2.checked is explicitly set to false, even though setting
`input1.checked = true` already unchecks input2.
I think this fix is not complete because there is no guarantee that all
the inputs rerender at the same time? Hence the TODO. But in practice
they usually would and I _think_ this is comparable to what we had
before.
Also treating function and symbol as false like we used to and like we
do on initial mount.
This lets a registered object or value be "tainted", which we block from
crossing the serialization boundary. It's only allowed to stay
in-memory.
This is an extra layer of protection against mistakes of transferring
data from a data access layer to a client. It doesn't provide perfect
protection, because it doesn't trace through derived values and
substrings. So it shouldn't be used as the only security layer but more
layers are better.
`taintObjectReference` is for specific object instances, not any nested
objects or values inside that object. It's useful to avoid specific
objects from getting passed as is. It ensures that you don't
accidentally leak values in a specific context. It can be for security
reasons like tokens, privacy reasons like personal data or performance
reasons like avoiding passing large objects over the wire.
It might be privacy violation to leak the age of a specific user, but
the number itself isn't blocked in any other context. As soon as the
value is extracted and passed specifically without the object, it can
therefore leak.
`taintUniqueValue` is useful for high entropy values such as hashes,
tokens or crypto keys that are very unique values. In that case it can
be useful to taint the actual primitive values themselves. These can be
encoded as a string, bigint or typed array. We don't currently check for
this value in a substring or inside other typed arrays.
Since values can be created from different sources they don't just
follow garbage collection. In this case an additional object must be
provided that defines the life time of this value for how long it should
be blocked. It can be `globalThis` for essentially forever, but that
risks leaking memory for ever when you're dealing with dynamic values
like reading a token from a database. So in that case the idea is that
you pass the object that might end up in cache.
A request is the only thing that is expected to do any work. The
principle is that you can derive values from out of a tainted
entry during a request. Including stashing it in a per request cache.
What you can't do is store a derived value in a global module level
cache. At least not without also tainting the object.
## Summary
This is part of an effort to align the event loop in React Native with
its behavior on the Web. In this case, we're going to test enabling
microtasks in React Native (Fabric) and we need React to schedule work
using microtasks if available there. This just adds a feature flag to
configure that behavior at runtime.
## How did you test this change?
* Reviewed the generated code, which looks ok.
* Did a manual sync of this PR to Meta's internal infra and tested it
with my changes to enable microtasks in RN/Hermes.
The `resumeElement` function wasn't actually doing the correct thing
because it was resuming the element itself but what the child slot means
is that we're supposed to resume in the direct child of the element.
This is difficult to check for since it's all the possible branches that
the element can render into, so instead we just check this in
renderNode. It means the hottest path always checks the task which is
unfortunate.
And also, resuming using the correct nextSegmentId.
Fixes two bugs surfaced by this test.
---------
Co-authored-by: Josh Story <josh.c.story@gmail.com>
I do this by simply renaming the secret export name in the "subset"
bundle and this renamed version is what the FlightServer uses.
This requires us to be more diligent about always using the correct
instance of "react" in our tests so there's a bunch of clean up for
that.
This adds a regression test and fix for a case where a sync update
triggers selective hydration, which then leads to a "Maximum update
depth exceeded" error, even though there was only a single update. This
happens when a single sync update flows into many sibling dehydrated
Suspense boundaries.
This fix is, if a commit was the result of selective hydration, we
should not increment the nested update count, because those renders
conceptually are not updates.
Ideally, they wouldn't even be in a separate commit — we should be able
to hydrate a tree and apply an update on top of it within the same
render phase. We could do this once we implement resumable context
stacks.
`performSyncWorkOnRoot` has only a single caller, and the caller already
computes the next lanes (`getNextLanes`) before deciding to call the
function. So we can pass them as an argument instead of computing the
lanes again.
There was already a TODO comment about this, but it was mostly perf
related. However, @rickhanlonii noticed a discrepancy where the inner
`getNextLanes` call was not being passed the current work-in- progress
lanes. Usually this shouldn't matter because there should never be
work-in-progress sync work; it should finish immediately. There is one
case I'm aware of where we exit the work loop without finishing a sync
render, which is selective hydration, but even then it should switch to
the sync hydration lane, not the normal sync lane. So something else is
probably going on. I suspect it might be related to the
`enableUnifiedSyncLane` experiment.
This is likely related to a regression found internally at Meta. We're
still working on getting a proper regression test; I can come up with a
contrived one but I'm not confident it'll be the same as the actual
regression until we get a better repro.
Adds a missing test assertion for Server Context deprecation.
The PR that added this warning was based on an older revision than the
PR that added the test.
As agreed, we're removing Server Context. This was never official
documented.
We've found that it's not that useful in practice. Often the better
options are:
- Read things off the url or global scope like params or cookies.
- Use the module system for global dependency injection.
- Use `React.cache()` to dedupe multiple things instead of computing
once and passing down.
There are still legit use cases for Server Context but you have to be
very careful not to pass any large data, so in generally we recommend
against it anyway.
Yes, prop drilling is annoying but it's not impossible for the cases
this is needed. I would personally always pick it over Server Context
anyway.
Semantically, Server Context also blocks object deduping due to how it
plays out with Server Components that can't be deduped. This is much
more important feature.
Since it's already in canary along with the rest of RSC, we're adding a
warning for a few versions before removing completely to help migration.
---------
Co-authored-by: Josh Story <josh.c.story@gmail.com>
Build fails because the package does not exist. I've added the package
to npm but we need the publishing account to be a collaborator. I'm
reverting until we get that sorted so we don't block canaries
When I added react-server-dom-turbopack I failed to mark the package as
stable so it did not get published with the canary release. This adds
the package to the stable set so it will be published correctly
stacked on #27314
Turbopack requires a different module loading strategy than Webpack and
as such this PR implements a new package `react-server-dom-turbopack`
which largely follows the `react-server-dom-webpack` but is implemented
for this new bundler
Currently when we SSR a Flight response we do not emit any resources for
module imports. This means that when the client hydrates it won't have
already loaded the necessary scripts to satisfy the Imports defined in
the Flight payload which will lead to a delay in hydration completing.
This change updates `react-server-dom-webpack` and
`react-server-dom-esm` to emit async script tags in the head when we
encounter a modules in the flight response.
To support this we need some additional server configuration. We need to
know the path prefix for chunk loading and whether the chunks will load
with CORS or not (and if so with what configuration).
Refactors Resources to have a more compact and memory efficient
struture. Resources generally are just an Array of chunks. A resource is
flushed when it's chunks is length zero. A resource does not have any
other state.
Stylesheets and Style tags are different and have been modeled as a unit
as a StyleQueue. This object stores the style rules to flush as part of
style tags using precedence as well as all the stylesheets associated
with the precedence. Stylesheets still need to track state because it
affects how we issue boundary completion instructions. Additionally
stylesheets encode chunks lazily because we may never write them as html
if they are discovered late.
The preload props transfer is now maximally compact (only stores the
props we would ever actually adopt) and only stores props for
stylesheets and scripts because other preloads have no resource
counterpart to adopt props into. The ResumableState maps that track
which keys have been observed are being overloaded. Previously if a key
was found it meant that a resource already exists (either in this render
or in a prior prerender). Now we discriminate between null and object
values. If map value is null we can assume the resource exists but if it
is an object that represents a prior preload for that resource and the
resource must still be constructed.
This fixes so that you can postpone in a fallback. This postpones the
parent boundary. I track the fallbacks in a separate replay node so that
when we resume, we can replay the fallback itself and finish the
fallback and then possibly later the content. By doing this we also
ensure we don't complete the parent too early since now it has a render
task on it.
There is one case that this surfaces that isn't limited to
prerender/resume but also render/hydrateRoot. I left todos in the tests
for this.
If you postpone in a fallback, and suspend in the content but eventually
don't postpone in the content then we should be able to just skip
postponing since the content rendered and we no longer need the
fallback. This is a bit of a weird edge case though since fallbacks are
supposed to be very minimal.
This happens because in both cases the fallback starts rendering early
as soon as the content suspends. This also ensures that the parent
doesn't complete early by increasing the blocking tasks. Unfortunately,
the fallback will irreversibly postpone its parent boundary as soon as
it hits a postpone.
When you suspend, the same thing happens but we typically deal with this
by doing a "soft" abort on the fallback since we don't need it anymore
which unblocks the parent boundary. We can't do that with postpone right
now though since it's considered a terminal state.
I think I'll just leave this as is for now since it's an edge case but
it's an annoying exception in the model. Makes me feel I haven't quite
nailed it just yet.
