OSSForks/node
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/zebrajr/node.git synced 2026-01-15 12:15:26 +00:00
Code Issues Actions 7 Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

doc: improve PR-review paragraph in CONTRIBUTING.md

Browse Source 
* Remove redundant "blocking it or stopping it" as blocking and stopping
  are the same thing in this case.
* Make another sentence less wordy. Fix incorrect verb conjugation.
  Break into two clear sentences.

PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/17931
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Jon Moss <me@jonathanmoss.me>
Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com>
This commit is contained in:
Rich Trott
2017-12-31 21:18:44 -08:00
committed by Anatoli Papirovski
parent 5bda05548b
commit e6a401e0ae
1 changed files with 5 additions and 6 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

11
CONTRIBUTING.md
View File

@@ -602,12 +602,11 @@ your name on it. Congratulations and thanks for your contribution!
All Node.js contributors who choose to review and provide feedback on Pull
Requests have a responsibility to both the project and the individual making the
contribution. Reviews and feedback must be helpful, insightful, and geared
towards improving the contribution as opposed to simply blocking it or
stopping it. If there are reasons why you feel the PR should not land, explain
what those are. Do not expect to be able to block a Pull Request from advancing
simply because you say "No" without giving an explanation. It is also important
to be open to having your mind changed, and to being open to working with the
contributor to make the Pull Request better.
towards improving the contribution as opposed to simply blocking it. If there
are reasons why you feel the PR should not land, explain what those are. Do not
expect to be able to block a Pull Request from advancing simply because you say
"No" without giving an explanation. Be open to having your mind changed. Be open
to working with the contributor to make the Pull Request better.
Reviews that are dismissive or disrespectful of the contributor or any other
reviewers are strictly counter to the [Code of Conduct][].