The settings dialog appears on all tabs and should be reachable from
Suspense tab too. It's a bit weird because it's not contextual to the
tab and it shows you whatever your last settings tab was opened. Maybe
it should default to opening to the current tab's settings?
There aren't any Suspense specific settings yet but there definitely
will be. We could move the "Show all" into settings but it might be
frequently that you want to check why something isn't suspending a
Suspense boundary or test SSR streaming.
However, the general settings still apply to the Suspense tab. E.g.
switching dark/light mode.
<img width="857" height="233" alt="Screenshot 2025-09-27 at 12 35 05 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4a38e94f-2074-4dce-906b-9a1c40bccb9b"
/>
When forcing suspense/error we're doing that by scheduling a sync update
on the fiber. Resuspending a Suspense boundary can only happen sync
update so that makes sense. Erroring also forces a sync commit. This
means that no View Transitions fire.
However, unsuspending (and dismissing an error dialog) can be async so
the reveal should be able to be async.
This adds another hook for scheduling using the Retry lane. That way
when you play through a reveal sequence of Suspense boundaries (like
playing through the timeline), it'll run the animations that would've
ran during a loading sequence.
It's possible for the children to overflow the bounding rect of the root
in general when they overflow in the DOM. However even when it doesn't
overflow in the DOM, the bounding rect of the root can shrink while the
content is suspended. In fact, it's very likely.
Originally I thought we didn't need to consider this recursively because
document scrolling takes absolute positioned content into account but
because we're using nested overflow scrolling, we have to manually
compute this.
One thing that always bothered me is that the collapse buttons on either
side of the toolbar looks like left/right buttons which would conflict
with some steps buttons I plan to add. Another issue is that we'll need
to add more tool buttons to the top and probably eventually a Search
field. Ideally this whole section should line up vertically with the
height of the title row.
I also realized that all UIs that have some kind of timeline control
(and play/pause/skip) do that in the bottom below the content. E.g.
music players and video players all do that. We're better off playing
into that structure since that's the UI analogy we're going for here.
Makes it clearer what the weird timeline is for.
By moving it to the bottom it also frees up the top for the collapse
buttons and more controls.
__Horizontal__
<img width="794" height="809" alt="Screenshot 2025-09-26 at 3 40 35 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/dacad9c4-d52f-4b66-9585-5cc74f230e6f"
/>
__Vertical__
<img width="570" height="812" alt="Screenshot 2025-09-26 at 3 40 53 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/db225413-849e-46f1-b764-8fbd08b395c4"
/>
Tracks the environment names of the I/O in each SuspenseNode and sent it
to the front end when the suspenders change.
In the front end, every child boundary should really be treated as it
has all environment names of the parents too since they're blocked by
the parent too. We could do this tracking on backend but if there's ever
one added on the root would need to be send for every child.
This lets us highlight which subtrees are blocked by content on the
server.
---------
Co-authored-by: Sebastian "Sebbie" Silbermann <silbermann.sebastian@gmail.com>
When there are no named Activities we should hide the tree side panel
(and the button to show it). Since it's not implemented yet there are
never any ones so it's always hidden.
## Overview
This PR ships `<Activity />` to the `react@canary` release channel for
final feedback and prepare for semver stable release.
## What this means
Shipping `<Activity />` to canary means it has gone through extensive
testing in production, we are confident in the stability of the feature,
and we are preparing to release it in a future semver stable version.
Libraries and frameworks following the [Canary
Workflow](https://react.dev/blog/2023/05/03/react-canaries) should begin
implementing and testing the feature.
## Why we follow the Canary Workflow
To prepare for semver stable, libraries should test canary features like
`<Activity>` with `react@canary` to confirm compatibility and prepare
for the next semver release in a myriad of environments and
configurations used throughout the React ecosystem. This provides
libraries with ample time to catch any issues we missed before slamming
them with problems in the wider semver release.
Since these features have already gone through extensive production
testing, and we are confident they are stable, frameworks following the
[Canary Workflow](https://react.dev/blog/2023/05/03/react-canaries) can
also begin adopting canary features like `<Activity />`.
This adoption is similar to how different Browsers implement new
proposed browser features before they are added to the standard. If a
frameworks adopts a canary feature, they are committing to stability for
their users by ensuring any API changes before a semver stable release
are opaque and non-breaking to their users.
Apps not using a framework are also free to adopt canary features like
Activity as long as they follow the [Canary
Workflow](https://react.dev/blog/2023/05/03/react-canaries), but we
generally recommend waiting for a semver stable release unless you have
the capacity to commit to following along with the canary changes and
debugging library compatibility issues.
Waiting for semver stable means you're able to benefit from libraries
testing and confirming support, and use semver as signal for which
version of a library you can use with support of the feature.
## Docs
Check out the ["React Labs: View Transitions, Activity, and
more"](https://react.dev/blog/2025/04/23/react-labs-view-transitions-activity-and-more#activity)
blog post, and [the new docs for
`<Activity>`](https://react.dev/reference/react/Activity) for more info.
## TODO
- [x] Bump Activity docs to Canary
https://github.com/reactjs/react.dev/pull/7974
---------
Co-authored-by: Sebastian Sebbie Silbermann <sebastian.silbermann@vercel.com>
When the search query changes, we kick off a transition that updates the
search query in a reducer for TreeContext. The search input is also
using this value for an `input` HTML element.
For a larger applications, sometimes there is a noticeable delay in
displaying the updated search query. This changes the approach to also
keep a local synchronous state that is being updated on a change
callback.
Stacked on #34435.
This adds a method to get all suspended by filtered by a specific
Instance. The purpose of this is to power the feature when you filter by
Activity. This would show you the "root" within that Activity boundary.
This works by selecting the nearest Suspense boundary parent and then
filtering its data based on if all the instances for a given I/O info is
within the Activity instance. If something suspended within the Suspense
boundary but outside the Activity it's not included even if it's also
suspending inside the Activity since we assume it would've already been
loaded then.
Right now I wire this up to be a special case when you select an
Activity boundary same as when you select a Suspense boundary in the
Components tab but we could also only use this when you select the root
in the Suspense tab for example.
Stacked on #34425.
RSC stream info is split into one I/O entry per chunk. This means that
when a single instance or boundary depends on multiple chunks, it'll
show the same stream multiple times. This makes it so just the last one
is shown.
This is a special case for the name "RSC stream" but ideally we'd more
explicitly model the concept of awaiting only part of a stream.
<img width="667" height="427" alt="Screenshot 2025-09-09 at 2 09 43 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/890f6f61-4657-4ca9-82fd-df55a696bacc"
/>
Another remaining issue is that it's possible for an intermediate chunk
to be depended on by just a child boundary. In that case that can be
considered a "unique suspender" even though the parent depends on a
later one. Ideally it would dedupe on everything below. Could also model
it as every Promise depends on its chunk and every previous chunk.
### Problem
- Users encounter “Failed to construct 'URL': Invalid base URL” when
clicking the “View source” action in DevTools if the underlying base URL
is invalid.
- This exception originates from `new URL(relative, base)` and bubbles
up, interrupting the DevTools UI.
- Fixes GitHub issue
[#34317](https://github.com/facebook/react/issues/34317)
### Solution
- Wrap URL construction to:
- First try `new URL(sourceMapAt, sourceURL)`.
- If that fails, try `new URL(sourceMapAt)` as an absolute URL.
- If both fail, return `null` (no symbolication) rather than throwing.
- This preserves normal behavior for valid bases and absolute URLs,
while avoiding crashes for invalid bases.
### Implementation details
- Updated `symbolicateSource` in
`packages/react-devtools-shared/src/symbolicateSource.js` to handle
invalid base URL scenarios without throwing.
- Added/verified tests in
`packages/react-devtools-shared/src/__tests__/utils-test.js`:
- “should not throw for invalid base URL with relative source map” →
resolves to `null`.
- “should resolve absolute source map even if base URL is invalid” →
still resolves correctly.
### Test plan
- Lint/format:
- `yarn prettier-check`
- `yarn linc`
- Type checking:
- `yarn flow dom-node`
- Unit tests:
- `yarn test --watchAll=false utils-test`
- Optionally: `yarn test --watchAll=false utils-test inspectedElement`
- All of the above pass locally for experimental channel.
### Risks and rollout
- Risk: Low. Only affects cases where the base URL is invalid.
- Normal cases (valid base or absolute `sourceMappingURL`) are
unchanged.
- No user-facing API changes; DevTools UX becomes more resilient.
### Affected packages
- `react-devtools-shared`
### Related
- Fixes GitHub issue
[#34317](https://github.com/facebook/react/issues/34317)
### Checklist
- [x] Ran `yarn prettier-check`
- [x] Ran `yarn linc`
- [x] Ran `yarn flow dom-node`
- [x] Relevant unit tests passing
- [x] Linked issue and added a concise summary
<!--
Thanks for submitting a pull request!
We appreciate you spending the time to work on these changes. Please
provide enough information so that others can review your pull request.
The three fields below are mandatory.
Before submitting a pull request, please make sure the following is
done:
1. Fork [the repository](https://github.com/facebook/react) and create
your branch from `main`.
2. Run `yarn` in the repository root.
3. If you've fixed a bug or added code that should be tested, add tests!
4. Ensure the test suite passes (`yarn test`). Tip: `yarn test --watch
TestName` is helpful in development.
5. Run `yarn test --prod` to test in the production environment. It
supports the same options as `yarn test`.
6. If you need a debugger, run `yarn test --debug --watch TestName`,
open `chrome://inspect`, and press "Inspect".
7. Format your code with
[prettier](https://github.com/prettier/prettier) (`yarn prettier`).
8. Make sure your code lints (`yarn lint`). Tip: `yarn linc` to only
check changed files.
9. Run the [Flow](https://flowtype.org/) type checks (`yarn flow`).
10. If you haven't already, complete the CLA.
Learn more about contributing:
https://reactjs.org/docs/how-to-contribute.html
-->
## Summary
<!--
Explain the **motivation** for making this change. What existing problem
does the pull request solve?
-->
## How did you test this change?
<!--
Demonstrate the code is solid. Example: The exact commands you ran and
their output, screenshots / videos if the pull request changes the user
interface.
How exactly did you verify that your PR solves the issue you wanted to
solve?
If you leave this empty, your PR will very likely be closed.
-->
A Flow upgrade removed the bundled library definitinos for
SynthaticEvent and we probably want to use our internal definitions.
Those are not properly typed at this point yet, but we can look into
that as a followup.
