`isStrictModeNonCompliant` on the root just means that it supports
strict mode. It's inherited by other nodes.
It's not possible to opt-in to strict mode on the root itself but rather
right below it. So we should not mark the root as being non-compliant.
This lets you select the root in the suspense tab and it shouldn't show
as red with a warning.
This ignore a Suspense boundary from the timeline when it has no visual
representation. No rect. In effect, this is not blocking the user
experience.
Technically it could be an effect that mounts which can have a
side-effect which is visible.
It could also be a meta-data tag like `<title>` which is visible. We
could hoistables a virtual representation by giving them a virtual rect.
E.g. at the top of the page. This could be added after the fact.
This ensures that we don't scroll on changes to the timeline such as
when loading a new page or while the timeline is still loading.
We only auto scroll to a boundary when we perform an explicit operation
from the user.
<!--
Thanks for submitting a pull request!
We appreciate you spending the time to work on these changes. Please
provide enough information so that others can review your pull request.
The three fields below are mandatory.
Before submitting a pull request, please make sure the following is
done:
1. Fork [the repository](https://github.com/facebook/react) and create
your branch from `main`.
2. Run `yarn` in the repository root.
3. If you've fixed a bug or added code that should be tested, add tests!
4. Ensure the test suite passes (`yarn test`). Tip: `yarn test --watch
TestName` is helpful in development.
5. Run `yarn test --prod` to test in the production environment. It
supports the same options as `yarn test`.
6. If you need a debugger, run `yarn test --debug --watch TestName`,
open `chrome://inspect`, and press "Inspect".
7. Format your code with
[prettier](https://github.com/prettier/prettier) (`yarn prettier`).
8. Make sure your code lints (`yarn lint`). Tip: `yarn linc` to only
check changed files.
9. Run the [Flow](https://flowtype.org/) type checks (`yarn flow`).
10. If you haven't already, complete the CLA.
Learn more about contributing:
https://reactjs.org/docs/how-to-contribute.html
-->
## Summary
This pull request fixes a small UI issue in the React Developer Tools
settings panel.
The “Display density” field was appearing twice in the General tab.
Fix : https://github.com/facebook/react/issues/34791
## Overview
This PR ships the View Transition APIs to `react@canary`:
- [`<ViewTransition
/>`](https://react.dev/reference/react/ViewTransition)
-
[`addTransitionType`](https://react.dev/reference/react/addTransitionType)
This means these APIs are ready for final feedback and prepare for
semver stable release.
## What this means
Shipping `<ViewTransition />` and `addTransitionType` to canary means
they have gone through extensive testing in production, we are confident
in the stability of the APIs, and we are preparing to release it in a
future semver stable version.
Libraries and frameworks following the [Canary
Workflow](https://react.dev/blog/2023/05/03/react-canaries) should begin
implementing and testing these features.
## Why we follow the Canary Workflow
To prepare for semver stable, libraries should test canary features like
`<ViewTransition />` with `react@canary` to confirm compatibility and
prepare for the next semver release in a myriad of environments and
configurations used throughout the React ecosystem. This provides
libraries with ample time to catch any issues we missed before slamming
them with problems in the wider semver release.
Since these features have already gone through extensive production
testing, and we are confident they are stable, frameworks following the
[Canary Workflow](https://react.dev/blog/2023/05/03/react-canaries) can
also begin adopting canary features like `<ViewTransition />`.
This adoption is similar to how different Browsers implement new
proposed browser features before they are added to the standard. If a
frameworks adopts a canary feature, they are committing to stability for
their users by ensuring any API changes before a semver stable release
are opaque and non-breaking to their users.
Apps not using a framework are also free to adopt canary features like
`<ViewTransition>` as long as they follow the [Canary
Workflow](https://react.dev/blog/2023/05/03/react-canaries), but we
generally recommend waiting for a semver stable release unless you have
the capacity to commit to following along with the canary changes and
debugging library compatibility issues.
Waiting for semver stable means you're able to benefit from libraries
testing and confirming support, and use semver as signal for which
version of a library you can use with support of the feature.
## Docs
Check out the ["React Labs: View Transitions, Activity, and
more"](https://react.dev/blog/2025/04/23/react-labs-view-transitions-activity-and-more#view-transitions)
blog post, and [the new docs for `<ViewTransition
/>`](https://react.dev/reference/react/ViewTransition) and
[`addTransitionType`](https://react.dev/reference/react/addTransitionType)
for more info.
We override Cmd+F to jump to our search input instead of searching
through the HTML. This is ofc critical since our view virtualized.
However, Chrome DevTools installs its own listener on the document as
well (in the bubble phase) so if we prevent it at the document level
it's too late and it ends up stealing the focus instead. If we instead
listen at the documentElement it works as intended.
This auto updates to select the last entry in the timeline until we make
the first selection. That way when new content loads in, we show the
last timeline of what is visible.
We're showing too much noise in the side-panel when selecting a Suspense
boundary. The interesting thing to see directly is the "Suspended by".
The "props" are mostly useless because the `"name"` prop is already in
the tree. I'm now also showing it in the title bar of the selected
element panel. The "children" and "fallback" props are just the thing
that you can see in the tree view anyway.
The "state" is this weird section with just one field in it, which we
already have duplicated in the top toolbar as well. We can just delete
this. I make sure to show the icon and a "suspended..." section while
the boundary is still loading but now yet resuspended by force
suspending.
While still loading:
<img width="600" height="193" alt="Screenshot 2025-09-27 at 11 54 37 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/1c3f3a96-46e0-4b11-806f-032569c7d5b5"
/>
After loading:
<img width="602" height="266" alt="Screenshot 2025-09-27 at 11 54 53 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c43cc4cb-036f-4ced-9b0d-226c6320cd76"
/>
Resuspended after loading:
<img width="602" height="300" alt="Screenshot 2025-09-27 at 11 55 07 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0be01735-48a7-47dc-b5cf-e72ec71e0148"
/>
Rebased on #34454.
Always include the root in the timeline even if it has no unique
suspenders, since even if it won't suspend, we have to be able to see
that and step to one step before the next boundary to see the first
boundary that does suspend in its fallback state.
Also, if there's no current selection on initial mount, select the last
entry in the timeline. We usually do this with `selectedSuspenseID` but
that doesn't happen on initial load. So this does it on initial load if
nothing else is selected by then. That way when you reload you get the
initial root selected.
There's a problem here because we should really use one source of truth
and `selectedSuspenseID` doesn't really do anything now. Either it
should be its separate source of truth and you can't show components in
the side-panel or it should be derived from the other state.
If it's derived, once there's a selection, e.g. in the root, then even
if new timelines load it will never change but that's probably a good
thing.
We selected the root. This means that we're currently viewing the
Transition that rendered the whole screen. In laymans terms this is
really "Initial Paint". Once we add subtree selection, then the
equivalent should be called "Transition" since in that case it's really
about a Transition within the page. So if you've selected an Activity
tree this should be called "Transition".
Once we add the environment support to the timeline. The first entry on
the timeline should also be called "Initial Paint" when you haven't
selected an Activity and "Transition" when you have.
Technically they're both meant to be "Transition" but nobody thinks of
initial load as a "Transition" from the previous MPA page.
<img width="1214" height="419" alt="Screenshot 2025-09-29 at 5 18 58 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/cae263e3-133c-4fa9-9587-a7b2344199f4"
/>
If I can scroll the document due to it overflowing, I should be able to
scroll the suspense tab as much. The real rect for the root when it's
the document is really the full scroll height.
This doesn't fully eliminate the need to do recursive bounding boxes for
the root since it's still possible to have the rects overflow. E.g. if
they're currently resuspended or inside nested scrolls.
~However, maybe we should have the actual paintable root rect just be
this rectangle instead of including the recursive ones.~ Actually never
mind. The root really represents the Transition so it doesn't make sense
to give it any specific rectangle. It's rather the whole background.
This brings the Suspense boundary that's switching into view so that
when you play the loading sequence you can see how it plays out.
Otherwise it's really hard to find where things are changing.
This assumes we'll also scroll synchronize the suspense tab which will
bring it into view there too.
When you double click it will hide or show by jumping to the selected
index or one step before the selected.
Let's you go from a suspense boundary into the timeline to find its
position. I also highlight the step in the timeline when you hover the
rect.
This only works if it's in the selected root but all of those should be
merged into one single timeline.
One thing that's weird about the SuspenseNodes now is that they
sometimes gets deleted but not always when they're resupended. Nested
ones maybe? This means that if you double click to hide it, you can't
double click again to show it. This seems like an unrelated bug that we
should fix.
We could potentially repurpose the existing "Suspend" button in the
toolbar to do this too, or maybe add another icon there.
Stacked on #34625.
This is a nice way to step through the timeline and simulate the visuals
on screen as you do it. It's also convenient to step through one at a
time, especially with the forwards button.
However, the secondary purpose of this is that it helps anchor the UI
visually as something like a timeline like in a video so that the
timeline itself becomes more identifiable.
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/cb367c8e-9efb-4a00-a58e-4579be20beb8
The settings dialog appears on all tabs and should be reachable from
Suspense tab too. It's a bit weird because it's not contextual to the
tab and it shows you whatever your last settings tab was opened. Maybe
it should default to opening to the current tab's settings?
There aren't any Suspense specific settings yet but there definitely
will be. We could move the "Show all" into settings but it might be
frequently that you want to check why something isn't suspending a
Suspense boundary or test SSR streaming.
However, the general settings still apply to the Suspense tab. E.g.
switching dark/light mode.
<img width="857" height="233" alt="Screenshot 2025-09-27 at 12 35 05 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4a38e94f-2074-4dce-906b-9a1c40bccb9b"
/>
When forcing suspense/error we're doing that by scheduling a sync update
on the fiber. Resuspending a Suspense boundary can only happen sync
update so that makes sense. Erroring also forces a sync commit. This
means that no View Transitions fire.
However, unsuspending (and dismissing an error dialog) can be async so
the reveal should be able to be async.
This adds another hook for scheduling using the Retry lane. That way
when you play through a reveal sequence of Suspense boundaries (like
playing through the timeline), it'll run the animations that would've
ran during a loading sequence.
It's possible for the children to overflow the bounding rect of the root
in general when they overflow in the DOM. However even when it doesn't
overflow in the DOM, the bounding rect of the root can shrink while the
content is suspended. In fact, it's very likely.
Originally I thought we didn't need to consider this recursively because
document scrolling takes absolute positioned content into account but
because we're using nested overflow scrolling, we have to manually
compute this.
One thing that always bothered me is that the collapse buttons on either
side of the toolbar looks like left/right buttons which would conflict
with some steps buttons I plan to add. Another issue is that we'll need
to add more tool buttons to the top and probably eventually a Search
field. Ideally this whole section should line up vertically with the
height of the title row.
I also realized that all UIs that have some kind of timeline control
(and play/pause/skip) do that in the bottom below the content. E.g.
music players and video players all do that. We're better off playing
into that structure since that's the UI analogy we're going for here.
Makes it clearer what the weird timeline is for.
By moving it to the bottom it also frees up the top for the collapse
buttons and more controls.
__Horizontal__
<img width="794" height="809" alt="Screenshot 2025-09-26 at 3 40 35 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/dacad9c4-d52f-4b66-9585-5cc74f230e6f"
/>
__Vertical__
<img width="570" height="812" alt="Screenshot 2025-09-26 at 3 40 53 PM"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/db225413-849e-46f1-b764-8fbd08b395c4"
/>
Tracks the environment names of the I/O in each SuspenseNode and sent it
to the front end when the suspenders change.
In the front end, every child boundary should really be treated as it
has all environment names of the parents too since they're blocked by
the parent too. We could do this tracking on backend but if there's ever
one added on the root would need to be send for every child.
This lets us highlight which subtrees are blocked by content on the
server.
---------
Co-authored-by: Sebastian "Sebbie" Silbermann <silbermann.sebastian@gmail.com>
When there are no named Activities we should hide the tree side panel
(and the button to show it). Since it's not implemented yet there are
never any ones so it's always hidden.
