This lets us track what data each Server Component depended on. This
will be used by Performance Track and React DevTools.
We use Node.js `async_hooks`. This has a number of downside. It is
Node.js specific so this feature is not available in other runtimes
until something equivalent becomes available. It's [discouraged by
Node.js docs](https://nodejs.org/api/async_hooks.html#async-hooks). It's
also slow which makes this approach only really viable in development
mode. At least with stack traces. However, it's really the only solution
that gives us the data that we need.
The [Diagnostic
Channel](https://nodejs.org/api/diagnostics_channel.html) API is not
sufficient. Not only is many Node.js built-in APIs missing but all
libraries like databases are also missing. Were as `async_hooks` covers
pretty much anything async in the Node.js ecosystem.
However, even if coverage was wider it's not actually showing the
information we want. It's not enough to show the low level I/O that is
happening because that doesn't provide the context. We need the stack
trace in user space code where it was initiated and where it was
awaited. It's also not each low level socket operation that we want to
surface but some higher level concept which can span a sequence of I/O
operations but as far as user space is concerned.
Therefore this solution is anchored on stack traces and ignore listing
to determine what the interesting span is. It is somewhat
Promise-centric (and in particular async/await) because it allows us to
model an abstract span instead of just random I/O. Async/await points
are also especially useful because this allows Async Stacks to show the
full sequence which is not supported by random callbacks. However, if no
Promises are involved we still to our best to show the stack causing
plain I/O callbacks.
Additionally, we don't want to track all possible I/O. For example,
side-effects like logging that doesn't affect the rendering performance
doesn't need to be included. We only want to include things that
actually block the rendering output. We also need to track which data
blocks each component so that we can track which data caused a
particular subtree to suspend.
We can do this using `async_hooks` because we can track the graph of
what resolved what and then spawned what.
To track what suspended what, something has to resolve. Therefore it
needs to run to completion before we can show what it was suspended on.
So something that never resolves, won't be tracked for example.
We use the `async_hooks` in `ReactFlightServerConfigDebugNode` to build
up an `ReactFlightAsyncSequence` graph that collects the stack traces
for basically all I/O and Promises allocated in the whole app. This is
pretty heavy, especially the stack traces, but it's because we don't
know which ones we'll need until they resolve. We don't materialize the
stacks until we need them though.
Once they end up pinging the Flight runtime, we collect which current
executing task that pinged the runtime and then log the sequence that
led up until that runtime into the RSC protocol. Currently we only
include things that weren't already resolved before we started rendering
this task/component, so that we don't log the entire history each time.
Each operation is split into two parts. First a `ReactIOInfo` which
represents an I/O operation and its start/end time. Basically the start
point where it was start. This is basically represents where you called
`new Promise()` or when entering an `async function` which has an
implied Promise. It can be started in a different component than where
it's awaited and it can be awaited in multiple places. Therefore this is
global information and not associated with a specific Component.
The second part is `ReactAsyncInfo`. This represents where this I/O was
`await`:ed or `.then()` called. This is associated with a point in the
tree (usually the Promise that's a direct child of a Component). Since
you can have multiple different I/O awaited in a sequence technically it
forms a dependency graph but to simplify the model these awaits as
flattened into the `ReactDebugInfo` list. Basically it contains each
await in a sequence that affected this part from unblocking.
This means that the same `ReactAsyncInfo` can appear in mutliple
components if they all await the same `ReactIOInfo` but the same Promise
only appears once.
Promises that are only resolved by other Promises or immediately are not
considered here. Only if they're resolved by an I/O operation. We pick
the Promise basically on the border between user space code and ignored
listed code (`node_modules`) to pick the most specific span but abstract
enough to not give too much detail irrelevant to the current audience.
Similarly, the deepest `await` in user space is marked as the relevant
`await` point.
This feature is only available in the `node` builds of React. Not if you
use the `edge` builds inside of Node.js.
---------
Co-authored-by: Sebastian "Sebbie" Silbermann <silbermann.sebastian@gmail.com>
## Summary
This tool leverages DevTools to get the component tree from the
currently open React App. This gives realtime information to agents
about the state of the app.
## How did you test this change?
Tested integration with Claude Desktop
This uses the richer `serverAct` helper that we already use in other
tests.
This avoids using the `Scheduler`. We don't use that package on the
server so it doesn't make sense to simulate going through it.
Additionally, we really should be getting rid of it on the client too to
favor `postTask` polyfills.
We have many cases internally where the `containerInstance` resolves to
a comment node. `restoreRootViewTransitionName` is called when
`enableViewTransition` is on, even without introducing a
`<ViewTransition />`. So that means it can crash pages because
`containerInstance.style` is `undefined` just by turning on the flag.
This skips cancel/restore of root view transition name if a comment node is the root.
When needed.
For the external runtime we always include this wrapper.
For others, we only include it if we have an ViewTransitions affecting.
If we discover the ViewTransitions late, then we can upgrade an already
emitted instruction.
This doesn't yet do anything useful with it, that's coming in a follow
up. This is just the mechanism for how it gets installed.
Stacked on #33160.
By default, if `onDefaultTransitionIndicator` is not overridden, this
will trigger a fake Navigation event using the Navigation API. This is
intercepted to create an on-going navigation until we complete the
Transition. Basically each default Transition is simulated as a
Navigation.
This triggers the native browser loading state (in Chrome at least). So
now by default the browser spinner spins during a Transition if no other
loading state is provided. Firefox and Safari hasn't shipped Navigation
API yet and even in the flag Safari has, it doesn't actually trigger the
native loading state.
To ensures that you can still use other Navigations concurrently, we
don't start our fake Navigation if there's one on-going already.
Similarly if our fake Navigation gets interrupted by another. We wait
for on-going ones to finish and then start a new fake one if we're
supposed to be still pending.
There might be other routers on the page that might listen to intercept
Navigation Events. Typically you'd expect them not to trigger a refetch
when navigating to the same state. However, if they want to detect this
we provide the `"react-transition"` string in the `info` field for this
purpose.
Stacked on #33073.
React semantics is that Suspense boundaries reveal with a throttle
(300ms). That helps avoid flashing reveals when a stream reveals many
individual steps back to back. It can also improve overall performance
by batching the layout and paint work that has to happen at each step.
Unfortunately we never implemented this for SSR streaming - only for
client navigations. This is highly noticeable on very dynamic sites with
lots of Suspense boundaries. It can look good with a client nav but feel
glitchy when you reload the page or initial load.
This fixes the Fizz runtime to be throttled and reveals batched into a
single paint at a time. We do this by first tracking the last paint
after the complete (this will be the first paint if `rel="expect"` is
respected). Then in the `completeBoundary` operation we queue the
operation and then flush it all into a throttled batch.
Another motivation is that View Transitions need to operate as a batch
and individual steps get queued in a sequence so it's extra important to
include as much content as possible in each animated step. This will be
done in a follow up for SSR View Transitions.
Stacked on #33065.
The runtime is about to be a lot more complicated so we need to start
sharing some more code.
The problem with sharing code is that we want the inline runtime to as
much as possible be isolated in its scope using only a few global
variables to refer across runtimes.
A problem with Closure Compiler is that it refuses to inline functions
if they have closures inside of them. Which makes sense because of how
VMs work it can cause memory leaks. However, in our cases this doesn't
matter and code size matters more. So we can't use many clever tricks.
So this just favors writing the source in the inline form. Then we add
an extra compiler pass to turn those global variables into local
variables in the external runtime.
Adds Fragment Ref support to RN through the Fabric config, starting with
`observeUsing`/`unobserveUsing`. This is mostly a copy from the
implementation on DOM, and some of it can likely be shared in the future
but keeping it separate for now and we can refactor as we add more
features.
Added a basic test with Fabric, but testing specific methods requires so
much mocking that it doesn't seem valuable here.
I built Fabric and ran on the Catalyst app internally to test with
intersection observers end to end.
This is a new extension that Chrome added to the existing
`console.timeStamp` similar to the extensions added to
`performance.measure`. This one should be significantly faster because
it doesn't have the extra object indirection, it doesn't return a
`PerformanceMeasure` entry and doesn't register itself with the global
system of entries.
I also use `performance.measure` in DEV for errors since we can attach
the error to the `properties` extension which doesn't exist for
`console.timeStamp`.
A downside of using this API is that there's no programmatic API for the
site itself to collect its own logs from React. Which the previous
allowed us to use the standard `performance.getEntries()` for. The
recommendation instead will be for the site to patch `console.timeStamp`
if it wants to collect measurements from React just like you're
recommended to patch `console.error` or `fetch` or whatever to collect
other instrumentation metrics.
This extension works in Chrome canary but it doesn't yet work fully in
Chrome stable. We might want to wait until it has propagated to Chrome
to stable. It should be in Chrome 136.
See https://github.com/rollup/plugins/issues/1425
Currently, `@babel/helper-string-parser/lib/index.js` is either emitted
as a wrapped esmodule or inline depending on the ordering of async
functions in `rollup/commonjs`. Specifically,
`@babel/types/lib/definitions/core.js` is cyclic (i.e. transitively
depends upon itself), but sometimes
`@babel/helper-string-parser/lib/index.js` is emitted before this is
realized.
A relatively straightforward patch is to wrap all modules (see
https://github.com/rollup/plugins/issues/1425#issuecomment-1465626736).
This only regresses `eslint-plugin-react-hooks` bundle size by ~1.8% and
is safer (see
https://github.com/rollup/plugins/blob/master/packages/commonjs/README.md#strictrequires)
> The default value of true will wrap all CommonJS files in functions
which are executed when they are required for the first time, preserving
NodeJS semantics. This is the safest setting and should be used if the
generated code does not work correctly with "auto". Note that
strictRequires: true can have a small impact on the size and performance
of generated code, but less so if the code is minified.
(note that we're on an earlier version of `@rollup/commonjs` which does
not default to `strictRequires: true`)
Stacked on #32862 and #32842.
This means that Activity boundaries now act as boundaries which can have
their effects mounted independently. Just like Suspense boundaries, we
hydrate the outer content first and then start hydrating the content in
an Offscreen lane. Flowing props or interacting with the content
increases the priority just like Suspense boundaries.
This skips emitting even the comments for `<Activity mode="hidden">` so
we don't hydrate those. Instead those are deferred to a later client
render.
The implementation are just forked copies of the SuspenseComponent
branches and then carefully going through each line and tweaking it.
The main interesting bit is that, unlike Suspense, Activity boundaries
don't have fallbacks so all those branches where you might commit a
suspended tree disappears. Instead, if something suspends while
hydration, we can just leave the dehydrated content in place. However,
if something does suspend during client rendering then it should bubble
up to the parent. Therefore, we have to be careful to only
pushSuspenseHandler when hydrating. That's really the main difference.
This just uses the existing basic Activity tests but I've started work
on port all of the applicable Suspense tests in SelectiveHydration-test
and PartialHydration-test to Activity versions.
## Summary
This fixes how we map priorities between Fabric and the React
reconciler. At the moment, we're only considering default and discrete
priorities, when there's a larger range of priorities available.
In Fabric, we'll test supporting additional priorities soon. For that
test to do something useful, we need the new priorities to be mapped to
reconciler priorities correctly, which is what this change is done.
> [!IMPORTANT]
> At the moment, this is a no-op because Fabric is only reporting
default and discrete event priorities.
## How did you test this change?
Will test e2e on React Native on top of
https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/50627
The changes are gated in React Native, so we'll use that feature flag to
test this.
Stacked on #32785.
This is now replaced by `startGestureTransition` added in #32785.
I also renamed the flag from `enableSwipeTransition` to
`enableGestureTransition` to correspond to the new name.
Stacked on #32783. This will replace [the `useSwipeTransition`
API](https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/32373).
Instead, of a special Hook, you can make updates to `useOptimistic`
Hooks within the `startGestureTransition` scope.
```
import {unstable_startGestureTransition as startGestureTransition} from 'react';
const cancel = startGestureTransition(timeline, () => {
setOptimistic(...);
}, options);
```
There are some downsides to this like you can't define two directions as
once and there's no "standard" direction protocol. It's instead up to
libraries to come up with their own conventions (although we can suggest
some).
The convention is still that a gesture recognizer has two props `action`
and `gesture`. The `gesture` prop is a Gesture concept which now behaves
more like an Action but 1) it can't be async 2) it shouldn't have
side-effects. For example you can't call `setState()` in it except on
`useOptimistic` since those can be reverted if needed. The `action` is
invoked with whatever side-effects you want after the gesture fulfills.
This is isomorphic and not associated with a specific renderer nor root
so it's a bit more complicated.
To implement this I unify with the `ReactSharedInternal.T` property to
contain a regular Transition or a Gesture Transition (the `gesture`
field). The benefit of this unification means that every time we
override this based on some scope like entering `flushSync` we also
override the `startGestureTransition` scope. We just have to be careful
when we read it to check the `gesture` field to know which one it is.
(E.g. I error for setState / requestFormReset.)
The other thing that's unique is the `cancel` return value to know when
to stop the gesture. That cancellation is no longer associated with any
particular Hook. It's more associated with the scope of the
`startGestureTransition`. Since the schedule of whether a particular
gesture has rendered or committed is associated with a root, we need to
somehow associate any scheduled gestures with a root.
We could track which roots we update inside the scope but instead, I
went with a model where I check all the roots and see if there's a
scheduled gesture matching the timeline. This means that you could
"retain" a gesture across roots. Meaning this wouldn't cancel until both
are cancelled:
```
const cancelA = startGestureTransition(timeline, () => {
setOptimisticOnRootA(...);
}, options);
const cancelB = startGestureTransition(timeline, () => {
setOptimisticOnRootB(...);
}, options);
```
It's more like it's a global transition than associated with the roots
that were updated.
Optimistic updates mostly just work but I now associate them with a
specific "ScheduledGesture" instance since we can only render one at a
time and so if it's not the current one, we leave it for later.
Clean up of optimistic updates is now lazy rather than when we cancel.
Allowing the cancel closure not to have to be associated with each
particular update.
From what we can see, `build-info.json` is a vestigal file that we were
previously including in builds but are no longer since 2022 (see
https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/23257, which removes
`build-info.json` which would have broken
scripts/release/build-release-locally-commands/add-build-info-json.js).
Since this file is no longer built, instead of looking it up we default
to the `version` that was passed in as an argument to
scripts/release/prepare-release-from-npm.js. Since `version` is what is
pulled from npm, there should only be 1 consistent version for all the
packages that are pulled. Therefore, only 1 version (eg canary) needs to
be replaced to the new stable version.
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/32778).
* __->__ #32778
* #32777
https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/32529 added a dynamic flag for
this, but that breaks tests since the flags are not defined everywhere.
However, this is a static value and the flag is only for supporting
existing tests. So we can override it in the test config, and make it
static at built time instead.
Casing was incorrect.
Tested by running locally with a PAT.
```
$ scripts/release/download-experimental-build.js --commit=2d40460cf768071d3a70b4cdc16075d23ca1ff25
Command failed: gh attestation verify artifacts_combined.zip --repo=facebook/react
Error: failed to fetch attestations from facebook/react: HTTP 404: Not Found (https://api.github.com/repos/facebook/react/attestations/sha256:23d05644f9e49e02cbb441e3932cc4366b261826e58ce222ea249a6b786f0b5f?per_page=30)
`gh attestation verify artifacts_combined.zip --repo=facebook/react` (exited with error code 1)
$ scripts/release/download-experimental-build.js --commit=2d40460cf768071d3a70b4cdc16075d23ca1ff25 --noVerify
⠼ Downloading artifacts from GitHub for commit 2d40460cf7) 5% 0.1m, estimated 1.6m
✓ Downloading artifacts from GitHub for commit 2d40460cf7) 9.5 secs
An experimental build has been downloaded!
You can download this build again by running:
scripts/download-experimental-build.js --commit=2d40460cf768071d3a70b4cdc16075d23ca1ff25
```
We now generate attestations in `process_artifacts_combined` so we can
verify the provenance of the build later in other workflows. However,
this requires `write` permissions for `id-token` and `attestations` so
PRs from forks cannot generate this attestation.
To get around this, I added a `--no-verify` flag to
scripts/release/download-experimental-build.js. This flag is only passed
in `runtime_build_and_test.yml` for the sizebot job, since 1) the
workflow runs in the `pull_request` trigger which has read-only
permissions, and 2) the downloaded artifact is only used for sizebot
calculation, and not actually used.
The flag is explicitly not passed in `runtime_commit_artifacts.yml`
since there we actually use the artifact internally. This is fine as
once a PR lands on main, it will then run the build on that new commit
and generate an attestation.
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/32738).
* #32739
* __->__ #32738
Uses https://cli.github.com/manual/gh_attestation_verify to verify that
the downloaded artifact matches the attestation generated during the
build process in runtime_commit_artifacts.
Example:
On a workflow run of runtime_build_and_test.yml with no attestations:
```
$ scripts/release/download-experimental-build.js --commit=ea5f065745b777cb41cc9e54a3b29ed8c727a574
Command failed: gh attestation verify artifacts_combined.zip --repo=facebook/react
Error: failed to fetch attestations from facebook/react: HTTP 404: Not Found (https://api.github.com/repos/facebook/react/attestations/sha256:7adba0992ba477a927aad5a07f95ee2deb7d18427c84279d33fc40a3bc28ebaa?per_page=30)
`gh attestation verify artifacts_combined.zip --repo=facebook/react` (exited with error code 1)
```
On one which does:
```
$ scripts/release/download-experimental-build.js --commit=12e85d74c1c233cdc2f3228a97473a4435d50c3b
✓ Downloading artifacts from GitHub for commit 12e85d74c1c233cdc2f3228a97473a4435d50c3b) 10.5 secs
An experimental build has been downloaded!
You can download this build again by running:
scripts/download-experimental-build.js --commit=12e85d74c1c233cdc2f3228a97473a4435d50c3b
```
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/32728).
* #32729
* __->__ #32728
We only need the compiler built for `yarn test` in the root directory.
Rather than always cache both for every step, let's just do it where
it's needed explicitly.
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/32608).
* #32609
* __->__ #32608
Now that the compiler lint rule is merged into
eslint-plugin-react-hooks, we also need to update our caches so compiler
dependencies are also cached. This should fix the CI walltime regression
we are now seeing.
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/32603).
* #32604
* __->__ #32603
This change merges the `react-compiler` rule from
`eslint-plugin-react-compiler` into the `eslint-plugin-react-hooks`
plugin. In order to do the move in a way that keeps commit history with
the moved files, but also no remove them from their origin until a
future cleanup change can be done, I did the `git mv` first, and then
recreated the files that were moved in their original places, as a
separate commit. Unfortunately GH shows the moved files as new instead
of the ones that are truly new. But in the IDE and `git blame`, commit
history is intact with the moved files.
Since this change adds new dependencies, and one of those dependencies
has a higher `engines` declaration for `node` than what the plugin
currently has, this is technically a breaking change and will have to go
out as part of a major release.
### Related Changes
- https://github.com/facebook/react/pull/32458
---------
Co-authored-by: Lauren Tan <poteto@users.noreply.github.com>
This is really the essence mechanism of the `useSwipeTransition`
feature.
We don't want to immediately switch to the destination state when
starting a gesture. The effects remain mounted on the current state. We
want the current state to be "live". This is important to for example
allow a video to keeping playing while starting a swipe (think
TikTok/Reels) and not stop until you've committed the action. The only
thing that can be live is the "new" state. Therefore we treat the
destination as the "old" state and perform a reverse animation from
there.
Ideally we could apply the old state to the DOM tree, take a snapshot
and then revert it back in the mutation of `startViewTransition`.
Unfortunately, the way `startViewTransition` was designed it always
paints one frame of the "old" state which would lead this to cause a
flicker.
To work around this, we need to create a clone of any View Transition
boundary that might be mutated and then render that offscreen. That way
we can render the "current" state on screen and the "destination" state
offscreen for the screenshots. Being mutated can be either due to React
doing a DOM mutation or if a child boundary resizes that causes the
parent to relayout. We don't have to do this for insertions or deletions
since they only appear on one side.
The worst case scenario is that we have to clone the whole root. That's
what this first PR implements. We clone the container and if it's not
absolutely positioned, we position it on top of the current one. If the
container is `document` or `<html>` we instead clone the `<body>` tag
since it's the only one we can insert a duplicate of. If the container
is deep in the tree we clone just that even though technically we should
probably clone the whole document in that case. We just keep the impact
smaller. Ideally though we'd never hit this case. In fact, if we clone
the document we issue a warning (always for now) since you probably
should optimize this. In the future I intend to add optimizations when
affected View Transition boundaries are absolutely positioned since they
cannot possibly relayout the parent. This would be the ideal way to use
this feature most efficiently but it still works without it.
Since we render the "old" state outside the viewport, we need to then
adjust the animation to put it back into the viewport. This is the
trickiest part to get right while still preserving any customization of
the View Transitions done using CSS. This current approach reapplies all
the animations with adjusted keyframes.
In the case of an "exit" the pseudo-element itself is positioned outside
the viewport but since we can't programmatically update the style of the
pseudo-element itself we instead adjust all the keyframes to put it back
into the viewport. If there is no animation on the group we add one.
In the case of an "update" the pseudo-element is positioned on the new
state which is already inside the viewport. However, the auto-generated
animation of the group has a starting keyframe that starts outside the
viewport. In this case we need to adjust that keyframe.
In the future I might explore a technique that inserts stylesheets
instead of mutating the animations. It might be simpler. But whatever
hacks work to maximize the compatibility is best.
It's getting unwieldy to list every single package to skip in these
commands when you only want to publish one, ie
eslint-plugin-react-hooks.
This adds a new `onlyPackages` and `publishVersion` option to the
publish commands to make that easier.
## Summary
> [!NOTE]
> This only modifies types, so shouldn't have an impact at runtime.
Some time ago we moved some type definitions from React to React Native
in #26437.
This continues making progress on that so values that are created by
React Native and passed to the React renderer (in this case public
instances) are actually defined in React Native and not in React.
This will allow us to modify the definition of some of these types
without having to make changes in the React repository (in the short
term, we want to refactor PublicInstance from an object to an interface,
and then modify that interface to add all the new DOM methods).
## How did you test this change?
Manually synced `ReactNativeTypes` on top of
https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/49602 and verified Flow
passes.
We can only render one direction at a time with View Transitions. When
the direction changes we need to do another render in the new direction
(returning previous or next).
To determine direction we store the position we started at and anything
moving to a lower value (left/up) is "previous" direction (`false`) and
anything else is "next" (`true`) direction.
For the very first render we won't know which direction you're going
since you're still on the initial position. It's useful to start the
render to allow the view transition to take control before anything
shifts around so we start from the original position. This is not
guaranteed though if the render suspends.
For now we start the first render by guessing the direction such as if
we know that prev/next are the same as current. With the upcoming auto
start mode we can guess more accurately there before we start. We can
also add explicit APIs to `startGesture` but ideally it wouldn't matter.
Ideally we could just start after the first change in direction from the
starting point.
This Hook will be used to drive a View Transition based on a gesture.
```js
const [value, startGesture] = useSwipeTransition(prev, current, next);
```
The `enableSwipeTransition` flag will depend on `enableViewTransition`
flag but we may decide to ship them independently. This PR doesn't do
anything interesting yet. There will be a lot more PRs to build out the
actual functionality. This is just wiring up the plumbing for the new
Hook.
This first PR is mainly concerned with how the whole starts (and stops).
The core API is the `startGesture` function (although there will be
other conveniences added in the future). You can call this to start a
gesture with a source provider. You can call this multiple times in one
event to batch multiple Hooks listening to the same provider. However,
each render can only handle one source provider at a time and so it does
one render per scheduled gesture provider.
This uses a separate `GestureLane` to drive gesture renders by marking
the Hook as having an update on that lane. Then schedule a render. These
renders should be blocking and in the same microtask as the
`startGesture` to ensure it can block the paint. So it's similar to
sync.
It may not be possible to finish it synchronously e.g. if something
suspends. If so, it just tries again later when it can like any other
render. This can also happen because it also may not be possible to
drive more than one gesture at a time like if we're limited to one View
Transition per document. So right now you can only run one gesture at a
time in practice.
These renders never commit. This means that we can't clear the
`GestureLane` the normal way. Instead, we have to clear only the root's
`pendingLanes` if we don't have any new renders scheduled. Then wait
until something else updates the Fiber after all gestures on it have
stopped before it really clears.
Merges the useResourceEffect API into useEffect while keeping the
underlying implementation the same. useResourceEffect will be removed in
the next diff.
To fork between behavior we rely on a `typeof` check for the updater or
destroy function in addition to the CRUD feature flag. This does now
have to be checked every time (instead of inlined statically like before
due to them being different hooks) which will incur some non-zero amount
(possibly negligble) of overhead for every effect.
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/32205).
* #32206
* __->__ #32205
This implements `findSourceMapURL` in react-server-dom-parcel, enabling
source maps for replayed server errors on the client. It utilizes a new
endpoint in the Parcel dev server that returns the source map for a
given bundle/file. The error overlay UI has also been updated to handle
these stacks. See https://github.com/parcel-bundler/parcel/pull/10082
Also updated the fixture to the latest Parcel canary. A few APIs have
changed. We do have a higher level library wrapper now (`@parcel/rsc`
added in https://github.com/parcel-bundler/parcel/pull/10074) but I left
the fixture using the lower level APIs directly here since it is easier
to see how react-server-dom-parcel is used.
Addresses https://github.com/facebook/react/issues/32244.
### Chromium
We will use
[chrome.permissions](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/extensions/reference/api/permissions)
for checking / requesting `clipboardWrite` permission before copying
something to the clipboard.
### Firefox
We will keep `clipboardWrite` as a required permission, because there is
no reliable and working API for requesting optional permissions for
extensions that are extending browser DevTools:
- `chrome.permissions` is unavailable for devtools pages -
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1796933
- You can't call `chrome.permissions.request` from background, because
this instruction has to be executed inside user-event callback,
basically only initiated by user.
I don't really want to come up with solutions like opening a new tab
with a button that user has to click.
Building DevTools is currently the long pole for the runtime CI job.
Let's see if we can get the overall runtime for runtime build and test
down by speeding this one step up.
---
[//]: # (BEGIN SAPLING FOOTER)
Stack created with [Sapling](https://sapling-scm.com). Best reviewed
with [ReviewStack](https://reviewstack.dev/facebook/react/pull/32266).
* #32267
* __->__ #32266
## Summary
We're adding support for `Document` instances in React Native (as
`ReactNativeDocument` instances) in
https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/49012 , which requires the
React Fabric renderer to handle its lifecycle.
This modifies the renderer to create those document instances and
associate them with the React root, and provides a new method for React
Native to access them given its containerTag / rootTag.
## How did you test this change?
Tested e2e in https://github.com/facebook/react-native/pull/49012
manually syncing these changes.
