Add column number for `viewSourceLineFunction` and renamed the function to `viewUrlSourceFunction` to match the other source function naming conventions
* [DevTools] front-end for profiling event stack
Adds a side-bar to the profiling tab. Users can now select an update event, and are
shown the callstack from the originating component. When a source path is available
there is now UI to jump to source.
Add FB enabled feature flag: enableProfilerComponentTree for the side-bar.
resolves#24170
* Move createRoot/hydrateRoot to /client
We want these APIs ideally to be imported separately from things you
might use in arbitrary components (like flushSync). Those other methods
are "isomorphic" to how the ReactDOM tree is rendered. Similar to hooks.
E.g. importing flushSync into a component that only uses it on the client
should ideally not also pull in the entry client implementation on the
server.
This also creates a nicer parity with /server where the roots are in a
separate entry point.
Unfortunately, I can't quite do this yet because we have some legacy APIs
that we plan on removing (like findDOMNode) and we also haven't implemented
flushSync using a flag like startTransition does yet.
Another problem is that we currently encourage these APIs to be aliased by
/profiling (or unstable_testing). In the future you don't have to alias
them because you can just change your roots to just import those APIs and
they'll still work with the isomorphic forms. Although we might also just
use export conditions for them.
For that all to work, I went with a different strategy for now where the
real API is in / but it comes with a warning if you use it. If you instead
import /client it disables the warning in a wrapper. That means that if you
alias / then import /client that will inturn import the alias and it'll
just work.
In a future breaking changes (likely when we switch to ESM) we can just
remove createRoot/hydrateRoot from / and move away from the aliasing
strategy.
* Update tests to import from react-dom/client
* Fix fixtures
* Update warnings
* Add test for the warning
* Update devtools
* Change order of react-dom, react-dom/client alias
I think the order matters here. The first one takes precedence.
* Require react-dom through client so it can be aliased
Co-authored-by: Andrew Clark <git@andrewclark.io>
* Add --no-show-signature to "git show" commands.
This fixes errors if the user has configured the following in their ~/.gitconfig:
[log]
showSignature = true
* yarn prettier-all
* Revert "Only show DevTools warning about unrecognized build in Chrome (#22571)"
This reverts commit b72dc8e930.
* Revert "Show warning in UI when duplicate installations of DevTools extension are detected (#22563)"
This reverts commit 930c9e7eeb.
* Revert "Prevent errors/crashing when multiple installs of DevTools are present (#22517)"
This reverts commit 545d4c2de7.
* Remove all references to passing extensionId in postMessage
* Keep build changes
* lint
This commit adds code to all React bundles to explicitly register the beginning and ending of the module. This is done by creating Error objects (which capture the file name, line number, and column number) and passing them explicitly to a DevTools hook (when present).
Next, as the Scheduling Profiler logs metadata to the User Timing API, it prints these module ranges along with other metadata (like Lane values and profiler version number).
Lastly, the Scheduling Profiler UI compares stack frames to these ranges when drawing the flame graph and dims or de-emphasizes frames that fall within an internal module.
The net effect of this is that user code (and 3rd party code) stands out clearly in the flame graph while React internal modules are dimmed.
Internal module ranges are completely optional. Older profiling samples, or ones recorded without the React DevTools extension installed, will simply not dim the internal frames.
## Summary
This commit is a proposal for handling duplicate installation of DevTools, in particular scoped to duplicates such as a dev build or the internal versions of DevTools installed alongside the Chrome Web Store extension.
Specifically, this commit makes it so when another instance of the DevTools extension is installed alongside the extension installed from the Chrome Web Store, we don't produce a stream of errors or crash Chrome, which is what would usually happen in this case.
### Detecting Duplicate Installations
- First, we check what type of installation the extension is: from the Chrome Web Store, the internal build of the extension, or a local development build.
- If the extension is from the **Chrome Web Store**:
- During initialization, we first check if the internal or local builds of the extension have already been installed and are enabled. To do this, we send a [cross-extension message](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/extensions/mv3/messaging/#external) to the internal and local builds of the extension using their extension IDs.
- We can do this because the extension ID for the internal build (and for the Chrome Web Store) is a stable ID.
- For the local build, at build time we hardcode a [`key` in the `manifest.json`](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/extensions/mv2/manifest/key/) which allows us to have a stable ID even for local builds.
- If we detect that the internal or local extensions are already installed, then we skip initializing the current extension altogether so as to not conflict with the other versions. This means we don't initialize the frontend or the backend at all.
- If the extension is the **Internal Build**:
- During initialization, we first check if the local builds of the extension has already been installed and is enabled. To do this, we send a [cross-extension message](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/extensions/mv3/messaging/#external) to the local build of the extension using its extension ID.
- We can do this for the local build because at build time we hardcode a [`key` in the `manifest.json`](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/extensions/mv2/manifest/key/) which allows us to have a stable ID even for local builds.
- If we detect that the local extension is already installed, then we skip initializing the current extension altogether so as to not conflict with the that version. This means we don't initialize the frontend or the backend at all.
- If the extension is a **Local Dev Build**:
- Since other extensions check for the existence of this extension and disable themselves if they detect it, we don't need any special handling during initialization and assume that there are no duplicate extensions. This means that we will generally prefer keeping this extension enabled.
This behavior means that the order of priority for keeping an extension enabled is the following:
1. Local build
2. Internal build
3. Public build
### Preventing duplicate backend initialization
Note that the backend is injected and initialized by the content script listening to a message posted to the inspected window (via `postMessage`). Since the content script will be injected twice, once each by each instance of the extension, even if we initialize the extension once, both content scripts would still receive the single message posted from the single frontend, and it would then still inject and initialize the backend twice.
In order to prevent this, we also add the extension ID to the message for injecting the backend. That way each content script can check if the message comes from its own extension, and if not it can ignore the message and avoid double injecting the backend.
### Other approaches
- I considered using the [`chrome.management`](https://developer.chrome.com/docs/extensions/reference/management/) API generally to detect other installations, but that requires adding additional permissions to our production extension, which didn't seem ideal.
- I also considered a few options of writing a special flag to the inspected window and checking for it before initializing the extension. However, it's hard to avoid race conditions in that case, and it seemed more reliable to check specifically for the WebStore extension, which is realistically where we would encounter the overlap.
### Rollout
- This commit needs to be published and rolled out to the Chrome Web Store first.
- After this commit is published to the Chrome Web Store, any duplicate instances of the extension that are built and installed after this commit will no longer conflict with the Chrome Web Store version.
### Next Steps
- In a subsequent PR, I will extend this code to show a warning when duplicate extensions have been detected.
Part of #22486
## How did you test this change?
### Basic Testing
- yarn flow
- yarn test
- yarn test-build-devtools
### Double installation testing
Testing double-installed extensions for this commit is tricky because we are relying on the extension ID of the internal and Chrome Web Store extensions, but we obviously can't actually test the Web Store version (since we can't modify the already published version).
In order to simulate duplicate extensions installed, I did the following process:
- Built separate extensions where I hardcoded a constant for whether the extension is internal or public (e.g. `EXTENSION_INSTALLATION_TYPE = 'internal'`). Then I installed these built extensions corresponding to the "internal" and "Web Store" builds.
- Build and run the regular development extension (with `yarn build:chrome:dev && yarn test:chrome`), using the extension IDs of the previously built extensions as the "internal" and "public" extension IDs.
With this set up in place, I tested the following on pages both with and without React:
- When only the local extension enabled, DevTools works normally.
- When only the "internal" extension enabled, DevTools works normally.
- When only the "public" extension enabled, DevTools works normally.
- When "internal" and "public" extensions are installed, "public" extension is disabled and "internal" extension works normally.
- When the local extension runs alongside the other extensions, other extensions disable themselves and local build works normally.
- When we can't recognize what type of build the extension corresponds to, we show an error.
- When all 3 extensions are installed and enabled in all different combinations, DevTools no longer produces errors or crashes Chrome, and works normally.
