* Upgrade fbjs-scripts
This script takes into account the NODE_ENV as part of jest cache keys.
This avoids flaky tests since we depend on different transforms in prod
and dev.
* Upgrade Fresh test to Babel 7 transform
I made a mistake when setting these up a while ago. Setting the NODE_ENV
in the CircleCI config doesn't work because it's also set in the node
script command.
The number of test commands is getting out of control. Might need to fix
it at some point. Not today for me.
Adds command `yarn merge-fork`.
```sh
yarn merge-fork --base-dir=packages/react-reconciler/src ReactFiberWorkLoop
```
This will take all the changes in `ReactFiberWorkLoop.new.js` and apply
them to `ReactFiberWorkLoop.old.js`.
You can merge multiple modules at a time:
```sh
yarn merge-fork \
--base-dir=packages/react-reconciler/src \
ReactFiberWorkLoop \
ReactFiberBeginWork \
ReactFiberCompleteWork \
ReactFiberCommitWork
```
You can provide explicit "old" and "new" file names. This only works
for one module at a time:
```sh
yarn merge-fork \
--base-dir=packages/react-reconciler/src \
--old=ReactFiberExpirationTime.js \
--new=ReactFiberLane.js
```
The default is to merge changes from the new module to the old one. To
merge changes in the opposite direction, use `--reverse`.
```sh
yarn merge-fork \
--reverse \
--base-dir=packages/react-reconciler/src \
ReactFiberWorkLoop
```
By default, the changes are compared to HEAD. You can use `--base-ref`
to compare to any rev. For example, while working on a PR, you might
make multiple commits to the new fork before you're ready to backport
them to the old one. In that case, you want to compare to the merge
base of your PR branch:
```sh
yarn merge-fork \
--base-ref=$(git merge-base HEAD origin/master)
--base-dir=packages/react-reconciler/src \
ReactFiberWorkLoop
```
* Upgrade Closure
There are newer versions but they don't yet have corresponding releases
of google-closure-compiler-osx.
* Configure build
* Refactor ReactSymbols a bit
Provides a little better output.
This reverts commit cf0081263c.
The changes to the test code relate to changes in JSDOM that come with Jest 25:
* Several JSDOM workarounds are no longer needed.
* Several tests made assertions to match incorrect JSDOM behavior (e.g. setAttribute calls) that JSDOM has now patched to match browsers.
* https://codesandbox.io/s/resets-value-of-datetime-input-to-fix-bugs-in-ios-safari-1ppwh
* JSDOM no longer triggers default actions when dispatching click events.
* https://codesandbox.io/s/beautiful-cdn-ugn8f
* JSDOM fixed (jsdom/jsdom#2700) a bug so that calling focus() on an already focused element does not dispatch a FocusEvent.
* JSDOM now supports passive events.
* JSDOM has improved support for custom CSS properties.
* But requires jsdom/cssstyle#112 to land to support webkit prefixed properties.
In CI, we run our test suite against multiple build configurations. For
example, we run our tests in both dev and prod, and in both the
experimental and stable release channels. This is to prevent accidental
deviations in behavior between the different builds. If there's an
intentional deviation in behavior, the test author must account
for them.
However, we currently don't run tests against the www builds. That's
a problem, because it's common for features to land in www before they
land anywhere else, including the experimental release channel.
Typically we do this so we can gradually roll out the feature behind
a flag before deciding to enable it.
The way we test those features today is by mutating the
`shared/ReactFeatureFlags` module. There are a few downsides to this
approach, though. The flag is only overridden for the specific tests or
test suites where you apply the override. But usually what you want is
to run *all* tests with the flag enabled, to protect against unexpected
regressions.
Also, mutating the feature flags module only works when running the
tests against source, not against the final build artifacts, because the
ReactFeatureFlags module is inlined by the build script.
Instead, we should run the test suite against the www configuration,
just like we do for prod, experimental, and so on. I've added a new
command, `yarn test-www`. It automatically runs in CI.
Some of the www feature flags are dynamic; that is, they depend on
a runtime condition (i.e. a GK). These flags are imported from an
external module that lives in www. Those flags will be enabled for some
clients and disabled for others, so we should run the tests against
*both* modes.
So I've added a new global `__VARIANT__`, and a new test command `yarn
test-www-variant`. `__VARIANT__` is set to false by default; when
running `test-www-variant`, it's set to true.
If we were going for *really* comprehensive coverage, we would run the
tests against every possible configuration of feature flags: 2 ^
numberOfFlags total combinations. That's not practical, though, so
instead we only run against two combinations: once with `__VARIANT__`
set to `true`, and once with it set to `false`. We generally assume that
flags can be toggled independently, so in practice this should
be enough.
You can also refer to `__VARIANT__` in tests to detect which mode you're
running in. Or, you can import `shared/ReactFeatureFlags` and read the
specific flag you can about. However, we should stop mutating that
module going forward. Treat it as read-only.
In this commit, I have only setup the www tests to run against source.
I'll leave running against build for a follow up.
Many of our tests currently assume they run only in the default
configuration, and break when certain flags are toggled. Rather than fix
these all up front, I've hard-coded the relevant flags to the default
values. We can incrementally migrate those tests later.
Our current lint config assumes a browser environment, which means it won't warn you if you use a variable like `name` without declaring it earlier. This imports the same list as the one used by create-react-app, and enables it against our codebase.
The changes to the test code relate to changes in JSDOM that come with Jest 25:
* Several JSDOM workarounds are no longer needed.
* Several tests made assertions to match incorrect JSDOM behavior (e.g. setAttribute calls) that JSDOM has now patched to match browsers.
* https://codesandbox.io/s/resets-value-of-datetime-input-to-fix-bugs-in-ios-safari-1ppwh
* JSDOM no longer triggers default actions when dispatching click events.
* https://codesandbox.io/s/beautiful-cdn-ugn8f
* JSDOM fixed (jsdom/jsdom#2700) a bug so that calling focus() on an already focused element does not dispatch a FocusEvent.
* JSDOM now supports passive events.
* JSDOM has improved support for custom CSS properties.
* But requires jsdom/cssstyle#112 to land to support webkit prefixed properties.
* Update Flow to 0.84
* Fix violations
* Use inexact object syntax in files from fbsource
* Fix warning extraction to use a modern parser
* Codemod inexact objects to new syntax
* Tighten types that can be exact
* Revert unintentional formatting changes from codemod
* Updated DevTools local development instructions to mention experimental build step
* Added a command to download latest experimental release (for DevTools)
* Updated build instructions for clarity
* Added build-for-devtools package alias
This babel transform is a fork of the @babel/plugin-transform-react-jsx transform and is for experimentation purposes only. We don't plan to own this code in the future, and we will upstream this to Babel at some point once we've proven out the concept.
As per the RFC to simplify element creation, we want to change the JSX transform from targeting React.createElement(type, props, children) to React.jsx(type, props, key). This modifies the existing @babel/plugin-transform-react-jsx (and helper) babel plugin to support React.jsx and React.jsxDEV.
The main differences between React.jsx/React.jsxDEV and React.createElement are:
1.) key is now passed as an explicit argument rather than through props
3.) children are now passed through props rather than as an explicit argument
4.) props must always be an object
5.) __source and and __self are now passed as separate arguments into React.jsxDEV rather than through props
Part of the rationale for this change is that we want to deprecate key spread through props because this is an expensive dynamic comparison operation. We want users instead always explicitly pass key as a prop. However, in the interim, we need a way to distinguish between <div {...props} key={foo} /> and <div key={foo} {...props} />. Therefore, until we completely deprecate key spreading, we will use React.createElement to transform <div {...props} key="Hi" /> and React.jsx to transform everything else.
Upgraded from Babel 6 to Babel 7.
The only significant change seems to be the way `@babel/plugin-transform-classes` handles classes differently from `babel-plugin-transform-es2015-classes`. In regular mode, the former injects a `_createClass` function that increases the bundle size, and in the latter it removes the safeguard checks. However, this is okay because we don't all classes in new features, and we want to deprecate class usage in the future in the react repo.
Co-authored-by: Luna Ruan <luna@fb.com>
Co-authored-by: Abdul Rauf <abdulraufmujahid@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Maksim Markelov <maks-markel@mail.ru>
* warn when using the wrong renderer's act around another renderer's updates
like it says. it uses a real object as the sigil (instead of just a boolean). specifically, it uses a renderer's flushPassiveEffects as the sigil. We also run tests for this separate from our main suite (which doesn't allow loading multiple renderers in a suite), but makes sure to run this in CI as well.
* unneeded (and wrong) comment
* run the dom fixture on CI
* update the sigil only in __DEV__
* remove the obnoxious comment
* use an explicit export for the sigil
* Lint rule for unminified errors
Add a lint rule that fails if an invariant message is not part of the
error code map.
The goal is to be more disciplined about adding and modifiying
production error codes. Error codes should be consistent across releases
even if their wording changes, for continuity in logs.
Currently, error codes are added to the error code map via an automated
script that runs right before release. The problem with this approach is
that if someone modifies an error message in the source, but neglects to
modify the corresponding message in the error code map, then the message
will be assigned a new error code, instead of reusing the existing one.
Because the error extraction script only runs before a release, people
rarely modify the error code map in practice. By moving the extraction
step to the PR stage, it forces the author to consider whether the
message should be assigned a new error code. It also allows the reviewer
to review the changes.
The trade off is that it requires more effort and context to land new
error messages, or to modify existing ones, particular for new
contributors who are not familiar with our processes.
Since we already expect users to lint their code, I would argue the
additional burden is marginal. Even if they forget to run the lint
command locally, they will get quick feedback from the CI lint job,
which typically finishes within 2-3 minutes.
* Add unreleased error messages to map
