For the initial iteration, only the default resolver can be
serialized/deserialized. If `dns.setServers()` has been
called, we'll preserve the configured DNS servers in the snapshot.
We can consider exposing the serialization method if it becomes
necessary for user-land snapshots.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/44633
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
The test involving melissadata.net was to make sure Node.js still
tolerated ValiCert 1024-bit certs. It has been several years since
melissadata.net used ValiCert as a root certificate and for that matter,
we removed ValiCert in a4dbf45b59 so it
would have broken then if it was still using it. The test is no longer
valid or needed and hasn't been for several years.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/39001
Reviewed-By: Zijian Liu <lxxyxzj@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Ubuntu 16.04 is going to be unsupported after April 2021. Switching
Node.js CI to Ubuntu 18.04 for the internet tests resulted in failures
in test-dns and test-dns-lookup because it returns server failure/try
again on .invalid domain. Add a hostname for testing that will return
record not found.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/38282
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
This will be a start to generalize all argument validation
errors. As currently we throw ARG/OPT, OUT_OF_RANGE, and other more
specific errors.
The OPT errors didn't bring much to the errors as it's just another
variant of ARG error which is sometimes more confusing (some of our code
used OPT errors to denote just argument validation errors presumably
because of similarity of OPT to 'option' and not 'options-object')
and they don't specify the name of the options object where the invalid
value is located. Much better approach would be to just specify path
to the invalid value in the name of the value as it is done in this PR
(i.e. 'options.format', 'options.publicKey.type' etc)
Also since this decreases a variety of errors we have it'd be easier to
reuse validation code across the codebase.
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/31251
Refs: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/34070#discussion_r467251009
Signed-off-by: Denys Otrishko <shishugi@gmail.com>
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/34682
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Improve error message from "The expression evaluated to a falsy value"
to a message formatted dynamically that lists the record types found so
that someone investigating can look at the code and determine which
values are missing.
This came up because the test failed in nightly master branch CI but
generally passes. It may prove helpful to know what record types were
missing. (All of them? Just one? Something else?)
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/31697
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
This completely refactors the `expectsError` behavior: so far it's
almost identical to `assert.throws(fn, object)` in case it was used
with a function as first argument. It had a magical property check
that allowed to verify a functions `type` in case `type` was passed
used in the validation object. This pattern is now completely removed
and `assert.throws()` should be used instead.
The main intent for `common.expectsError()` is to verify error cases
for callback based APIs. This is now more flexible by accepting all
validation possibilites that `assert.throws()` accepts as well. No
magical properties exist anymore. This reduces surprising behavior
for developers who are not used to the Node.js core code base.
This has the side effect that `common` is used significantly less
frequent.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/31092
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
ERR_INVALID_ARG_TYPE is the most common error used throughout the
code base. This improves the error message by providing more details
to the user and by indicating more precisely which values are allowed
ones and which ones are not.
It adds the actual input to the error message in case it's a primitive.
If it's a class instance, it'll print the class name instead of
"object" and "falsy" or similar entries are not named "type" anymore.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/29675
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
RFC 2606 reserves ithe .invalid top-level-domain for use in "domain
names that are sure to be invalid and which it is obvious at a glance
are invalid." Replace `dne.example.com` which actually isn't guaranteed
to not exist. (example.com is for examples, but at least one address
does in fact exist in that TLD.)
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/30545
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Historically `error.errno` of system errors thrown by Node.js
can sometimes be the same as `err.code`, which are string
representations of the error numbers. This is useless and incorrect,
and results in an information loss for users since then they
will have to resort to something like
`process.binding('uv'[`UV_${errno}`])` to get to the numeric
error codes.
This patch corrects this behavior by always setting `error.errno`
to be negative numbers. For fabricated errors like `ENOTFOUND`,
`error.errno` is now undefined since there is no numeric equivalent
for them anyway. For c-ares errors, `error.errno` is now undefined
because the numeric representations (negated) can be in conflict
with libuv error codes - this is fine since numeric codes was
not available for c-ares errors anyway.
Users can use the public API `util.getSystemErrorName(errno)`
to retrieve string codes for these numbers.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/28140
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Parse `CHANGELOG.md` for versions of Node.js used by the documentation
feature `View another version` so that we don't have to manually update
the list when we cut a new version or transition a release to LTS.
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/27661
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
* Add check that `signal` is not null in callback.
* Use arrow functions for callbacks, destructuring where appropriate,
and a trailing comma in multi-line arrays
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/26846
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Before this commit, Node.js left it up to the system resolver or c-ares.
Leaving it to the system resolver introduces platform differences
because:
* some support IDNA 2008
* some only IDNA 2003 (glibc until 2.28), and
* some don't support IDNA at all (musl libc)
c-ares doesn't support IDNA either although curl does, by virtue of
linking against libidn2. Upgrading from libidn1 to libidn2 in order
to get proper IDNA 2008 support was the fix for curl's CVE-2016-8625.
libidn2 is not an option (incompatible license) but ICU has an IDNA API
and we already use that in one place. For non-ICU builds, we fall back
to the bundled punycode.js that also supports IDNA 2008.
Fixes: https://github.com/nodejs-private/security/issues/97
Fixes: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/25558
PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/25679
Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <santiago.gimeno@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Saúl Ibarra Corretgé <saghul@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Tiancheng "Timothy" Gu <timothygu99@gmail.com>
